[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Prev in Thread] [Next in Thread] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Timestamp default value - weird problem



**
Interesting, there is a discrepancy ....at least on the .def files.  I'll compare the XMLs when I'm on a larger display.

On 2 May 2017 at 15:58, Dave Barber <daddy.barber@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi LJ - I'll try that with the form exports - but interestingly, I've found one copy on a server with history and the data in that field changed after the migration to 9.1 - on 7.6.04 it was just a regular time stamp in a text field, after the upgrade it became a UNIX date integer stored in a text field.

On 2 May 2017 at 15:43, LJ LongWing <lj.longwing@gmail.com> wrote:
**
Dave, maybe a copy of logs of the workflow or something...maybe a copy on a server that's not working, but working in a copy of the form...screen shots of the workflow in question...but if it's a default...there is no workflow....

try this....export two copies of the form...one that's working, the other that's not, from the same server...export both in XML format, compare and contrast the properties of that field, and the form in general...see if you can find some difference...

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Dave Barber <daddy.barber@gmail.com> wrote:
**
All,

We have a form, used as part of a notifications system, it has a 255 character field with a default value as $TIMESTAMP$.  So in theory it should store a value 02/05/2017 08:13:40 (UK/GMT date format)

We've recently gone through a series of upgrades, from Remedy 7.6.04 (on Solaris) to 9.1.02 (RHL).  All of our old test environments bar one have gone through an upgrade from 7.6.04 to 9.1.02 - and we have a range of dev/test environments that have always been on 9.1.02, with a copy of the database from one of the older environments.

"Bar one" is an important point - the only remaining 7.6.04 system is happily working as expected.  Every other system is storing the date in this field in UNIX format (ie. 1493712820).

I cannot figure out why this is happening - I've made a copy of the form, it behaves as expected.  I've created a new form and set $TIMESTAMP$ - works as expected.  But on this one form it isn't .... some strange form/field corruption?

Any suggestions as to a way forward with this?

Regards

Dave
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_


_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_